What do you want to communicate?
Knowledge is relative. Even if there is an absolute, the process of treating it like it's relative proves to be more productive. When executing on ideas it is important to commit like it is truth to provide a valid data point. Each generation hopefully adds a verse to the song of human history where our metaphors, ideas, and tools improve where the the proper references are made to the history such that we can create better tools while creating deeper meanings.
We progress knowledge by asking better questions, and frequent discourse with increasing capacity/skill and wisdom in managing discourse.
We become wiser by how we handle and evolve the process of discourse.
The nature of things seem to be some essence of thematically interconnected paradoxes.
Meaning is more often created than found let alone given.
This can be a very harrowing experience.
The conversation movers can come from anywhere. The lawnmower or professor however, the platforms we currently have seem to miss out on a lot of potential.
Ideas cross talk between industries and fields
How does a new dance fad affect physicists? How can a physics principle be represented in dance?
How do we avoid extended the elephant problem?
Elephant in the room because of fear/insecurities.
Touching different parts of the elephant and telling others you're right and others are not.
Is evidence a prerequisite for adoption?
Great ideas can be suggested, but what is the probability that will actually move things forward?
If you're a pioneer, the burden of proof is on you.
If you're an alien abductee, the burden of proof is on you.
What is true vs. what is useful vs. what is healthy.
Are your ideas improving/getting denser or are you just stringing together more concepts haphazardly?